Welcome to Behaviorbabe

Ethical Advocate for Accurate Application & Dissemination of Behavior Analysis

Presession Pairing

Presession pairing is defined as a therapist freely delivering preferred items or activities to a child and engaging with the child in a fun way before presenting academic demands (Barbera, 2007, 2009; Sundberg & Partington, 1998).

Purpose  

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of presession pairing of the instructor with preferred stimuli on challenging behaviors (either escape- or attention-maintained) and accurate academic responses for children with autism during DTT sessions. 

Abstract

As a result of pairing with work demands, the presence of an instructor may signal a worsening set of aversive conditions (i.e., reflexive conditioned motivating operation; CMO-R). The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of presession pairing of the instructor with preferred stimuli on disruptive behavior and correct academic responding. Functional analyses indicated a primary or combined escape function for three children diagnosed with autism. For participants with multiply-maintained challenging behavior, attention was a co-occurring function. Preference assessments were completed to identify preferred items for each participant. In the presession pairing phase, the investigator engaged playfully with the participant with a highly preferred item for 2-4 minutes immediately before the instructional session. The discrete-trial-training used to teach math and spelling skills was the same across the baseline and presession pairing sessions. Results in a multiple baseline across participants design indicated that presession pairing was effective in reducing disruptive behaviors and increasing inter-response times of challenging behaviors. Results also indicated that presession pairing had no effect (either positive or negative) on the percentage of correct academic responses.  Presession pairing was an effective antecedent procedure that increased opportunities for reinforcement and reduced self-injurious behavior, aggression, property destruction, and negative statements related to task demands, associated with discrete-trial-teaching sessions. When challenging behaviors occurred in presession pairing conditions, many occurred during error correction procedures.  Future researchers may want to investigate the effects of errorless teaching procedures in conjunction with presession pairing.  Future research should also replicate presession pairing procedures and continue investigating its mechanism by directly testing the reinforcing value of the adult paired with strong reinforcers. 


Effects of Presession Pairing on Challenging Behavior for Children with Autism, April 24, 2013, Dissertation Defense, Simmons College / PowerPoint pdf


Ethics in Applied Research, Presession Pairing, May 20, 2013, SEEM Collaborative  / PowerPoint pdf


Effects of Presession Pairing on Challenging Behavior for Children with Autism, May 26, 2013, ABAI2013, Minneapolis, Minnesota / PowerPoint pdf 


Les effets du pairing pré-session sur les comportements problèmes de l’enfant avec autisme, May 26, 2013, ABAI2013, Minneapolis, Minnesota / PowerPoint pdf  

References

Anderson, S. P., Taras, M., & O’Malley-Cannon, B. (1996).  Teaching new skills to young children with autism.  In C. Maurice, G. 

Green, & S.C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism  (pp. 181-194).  Austin, TX: PRO-ED. 


Barbera, M. L. (2007).  The Verbal Behavior Approach: How to teach children with autism and related disorders.  London, England: Jessica Kingsley.


Barbera, M. L. (2009, September 26). Pairing with reinforcement: The first step to teaching students with autism. Retrieved from http://verbalbehaviorapproach.blogspot.com/2009/ 09/pairing-with-reinforcement-first-step.html


Berg, W. K., Peck, S., Wacker, D. P., Harding, J., McComas, J., Richman, D., & Brown, K. (2000).  The effect of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 463-477. 


Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., & Steege, M. W. (1995). Best practices in assessments with persons who have severe or profound handicaps. In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology – III (pp. 805-816).


Cameron, M. J., Ainsleigh, S. A., & Bird, F. L. (1992).  The acquisition of stimulus control of compliance and participation during an ADL routine.  Behavioral Residential Treatment, 7, 327-340. 


Carbone, V. J., Morgenstern, B., Zecchin-Tirri, G., & Kolberg, L. (2010).  The role of the reflexive conditioned motivating operation (CMO-R) during discrete-trial instruction of children with autism.  Journal of Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention, 4, 658-680).


Carr, E. G. (1977).  The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111-126.


Carr, E. G. and Durand, V. M. (1985).  Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111-126.


Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2006).  Noncontingent reinforcement as antecedent behavior support.  In J.K. Luiselli (Ed.), Antecedent assessment & intervention: Supporting children & adults withdevelopmental disabilities in community settings (pp. 147-164).  Baltimore, MD: Brookes.


Catania, A.  C. (1961).  Behavioral Contrast in a multiple and concurrent schedule of reinforcement.  Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 335-342.


Cote, C. A., Thompson, R. H., & McKerchar, P. M. (2005).  The effects of antecedent interventions and extinction on toddlers’ compliance during transitions.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 235-238.


Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007).  Applied behavior analysis (2nd Ed).  Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.


Davis, C. A., Brady, M. P., Williams, R. E., & Hamilton, R. (1992).  Effects of high-probability requests on the acquisition and generalization of responses to requests in young children with behavior disorders.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25 905-916.


DeLeon, I. G., Neidert, P. L., Anders, B. M., & Rodriguez-Catter, V. (2001).  Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 521-525.


Derby, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Northrup, J., Cigrand, K., & Asmus, J. (1992).  Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: a summary of 79 cases.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 713-721.


Dib, N. E. & Sturmey, P. (2007).  Reducing student stereotypy by improving teachers’ implementation of discrete-trial-teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 339-343.


Drash, P. W. & Tudor, R.M. (1993).  A functional analysis of verbal delay in preschool children: Implications for prevention and total recovery.  The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 19-29.


Durand, V. M. & Crimmins, D. (1998).  Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 285-296.


Durand, V.M. & Carr, E. G. (1991).  Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: Maintenance and application in new settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 251-264.


Eikseth, S., Smith, T., Jahr, E., & Eldevik, S. (2002).  Intensive behavioral treatment at school for four to seven-year-old children with autism: A one-year follow-up.  Behavior Modification, 26, 49-68.


Fisher, W. W., DeLeon, I. G., Rodriguez-Catter, V., & Keeney, K. M. (2004).  Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through Noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 171-184.


Fisher, W. W., Kodak, T., & Moore, J. W. (2007).  Embedding an identity-matching task within a prompting hierarchy to facilitate acquisition of conditional discriminations in children with autism.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 489-499.

Goh, H. & Iwata, B. A. (1994).  Behavioral persistence and variability during extinction of self-injury maintained by escape.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 173-174.


Green, G. (1996).  Early behavioral intervention for autism: What does research tell us?  In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism  (pp. 181-194).  Austin, TX: PRO-ED.


Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003).  Functional analysis of challenging behavior: a review.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147-185.


Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., & Fisher, W. W. (1997).  Noncontingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 229-237.


Herscovitch, B.  (2011). Effects of algorithmic curricula upon implementation of trained and novel discrete-trial-teaching programs.  (Doctoral dissertation, Simmons College).


Iwata, B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994).  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197-209.


Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Green, G. (1998).  Cost-benefit estimates for early intensive behavioral intervention for young children with autism – general model and single state case.  Behavioral Interventions, 13, 201-226.


Jones, E. A., Feeley, K. M., & Takacs, J. (2007).  Teaching spontaneous responses to young children with autism.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 565-570.


Koegel, R. L., Camarata, S., Koegel, L. K., Ben-Tall, A., & Smith, A. E., (1998).  Increasing speech intelligibility in children with autism.  Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 241-251.


Kurt, O. & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2008).  A comparison of constant time delay and simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction on teaching leisure skills to children with autism.  Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 53-64.


Lafasakis, M. & Sturmey, P. (2007).  The effects of errorless learning and backward chaining on the acquisition of Internet skills in adults with developmental disabilities.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 185-189.


Lalli, J. S., Casey, S. D., & Kates, K. (1997).  Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe challenging behavior: some procedural variations.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 127-137.


Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003).  Motivating operations and terms to describe them: some further refinements.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407-414.


Leaf, R. & McEachin, J. (1999).  A work in progress: Behavior management strategies and curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism.  New York, NY: DRL Books.


Lee, D. L. (2005).  Increasing compliance: A quantitative synthesis of applied research on high-probability request sequences.  Exceptionality, 13, 141-154.


Lerman, D. C., Iwata, B. A., & Wallace, M. D. (1999).  Side effects of extinction: prevalence of bursting and aggression during the treatment of self-injurious behavior.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 1-8.


Lord, C. & McGee, J. P. (2001).  Educating children with autism.  National Academy Press: Washington, DC.


Lovaas, O. I. (1987).  Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children.  Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3-9.


Lovaas, O. I. (2003).  Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques.  Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.


Mace, F. C. & Belfiore, P. (1990).  Behavioural momentum in the treatment of escape-motivated stereotypy.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 507-514.


Maine Administrators of Services for Children with Disabilities (2000).  Report of the MADSEC Autism Task Force, Revised Edition.  Kennebec Centre, RR 2 Box 1856, Manchester, ME 04351, http://www.madsec.org/docs/atf.htm. 


Maine Department of Health and Human Services & the Maine Department of Education   (2009).  Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorders: State of the Evidence – Report of the Children’s Services Evidence-Based Practice Advisory Committee.  http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/ocfs/cbhs/ebpac/asd-report2009.pdf. 


Maurice, C., Green, G., & Luce, S. (1996).  Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals.  Austin, TX: Pro-ed.


McComas, J., Hoch, H., Paone, D., & El-Roy, D. (2000).  Escape behavior during academic tasks: A preliminary analysis of idiosyncratic establishing operations.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 479-493.


McComas, J. J., Thompson, A., & Johnson, L. (2003).  The effects of presession attention on challenging behavior maintained by different reinforcers.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 297-307.


McCord, B. E., Iwata, B. A., Galensku, T. L., Ellingson, S. A., Thomson, R. J. (2001).  Functional analysis and treatment of challenging behavior evoked by noise.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 447-462.


McCord, B. E., Thomson, R. J., & Iwata, B. A. (2001).  Functional analysis and treatment of self-injury associated with transitions.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 195-210.


McGill, P. (1999).  Establishing operations: implications for the assessment, treatment, and prevention of challenging behavior.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 393-418.


Michael, J. (1993).  Establishing Operations.  The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191-206.


Michael, J. (2000).  Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401-410.


Michael, J. (2005). Motivating operations. Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from jackmichael.org/ publications/presentations/momaryland.ppt. 


Mildon, R. L., Moore, D. W., & Dixon, R. S. (2004).  Combining noncontingent escape and functional communication training as a treatment for negatively reinforced disruptive behavior.  Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 92-102. 


Myers, S. M.  & Johnson, C. P. (2007).  Management of children with autism spectrum disorders.  Pediatrics, 120, 1162-1182.


National Research Council.  (2001). Educating children with autism.  Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Neidert, P. L., Iwata, B. A., & Dozier, C. L. (2005).  Treatment of multiply controlled challenging behavior with procedural variations of differential reinforcement.  Exceptionality, 13, 45-53.


O'Reilly, M. F. (1999). Effects of presession attention on the frequency of attention -maintained behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 371-374.


O’Reilly, M., Edrisinha, C., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., Machalicek, W., & Antonucci, M. (2007).  The effects of presession attention on subsequent attention-extinction and alone conditions.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 731-735.


Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T.R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998).  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620.


Rimland, B. (1994).  Recovery from autism is possible.  Autism Research Review International, 8, 3.


Rispoli, M., O’Reilly, M., Lang, R., Machalicek, W., Davis, T., Lancioni, G., and Sigafoos, J. (2011). Effects of Motivating Operations on Problem and Academic Behavior in Classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 187-192.


Roantree, C. F. & Kennedy, C. H. (2006).  A paradoxical effect of presession attention on stereotypy: Antecedent attention as an establishing, not abolishing, operation.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 381-384.


Rogers, S. J. (1998).  Empirically supported comprehensive treatments for young children with autism.  Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 167-178.


Sainato, D. & Lyon, S. A.  A descriptive analysis of the requirements for independent performance in handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool classrooms.  In: Strain P. S. (Chair), editor.  Assisting behaviorally handicapped preschoolers in mainstream settings: A report of research from the Early Childhood Research Institute.  Washington, D.C.: 1983.  Oct, Paper presented at the National Early Childhood Conference for Children with Special Needs.


Schwartz, I. S. & Baer, D. M. (1991).  Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189-204.


Shukla, S. & Albin, R. W. (1996). Effects of extinction alone plus functional communication training on covariation of problem behaviors.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 565-568.


Sidman, M. (1994).  Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story.  Boston: Authors Cooperative. 


Skinner, B. F. (1953).  Science and Human Behavior.  Cambridge, Massachusetts: B. F. Skinner Foundation.


Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior.  Cambridge, Massachusetts: B. F. Skinner Foundation.


Smith R. G, Iwata B. A, Goh H, Shore B. A. (1995).  Analysis of establishing operations for self-injury maintained by escape.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 515–535. 


Smith, T. (2001).  Discrete-trial instruction in the treatment of autism.  Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 86-92.


Sturmey, P. & A. Fitzer, A. (2007).  Applied Behavior Analysis in People with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Austin, TX: Proed Inc.


Sundberg, M. L. & Partington, J. W. (1998).  Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities.  Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.


Sulzer-Azaroff, B., Mayer, G., & Wallace M. D.  (2012). Behavior Analysis for lasting change (2nd Ed.).  Fort Worth: Holt-Rinehart-Winston.


Surgeon General.  (1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon general.  Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.


Tarbox, R. S. F., Ghezzi, P. M., & Wilson, G. (2006).  The effects of token reinforcement on attending in a young child with autism.  Behavioral Interventions, 21, 155-164.


Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Wright, C. S., Van Camp, C., & Lalli, J. S. (2001).  Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 269-287.


Vollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Smith, R. G., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1993).  The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9-21.


Waters, M. B., Lerman, D. C., & Hovanetz, A. N. (2009).  Separate and combined effects of visual schedules and extinction plus differential reinforcement on challenging behavior occasioned by transitions.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 309-313.


Weeks, M. & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1981).  Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 449-463. 


Wilder, D. A., Allison, J., Nicholson, K., Abellon, O.E., & Saulnier, R. (2010).  Further evaluation of antecedent interventions on compliance: the effects of rationales to increase compliance among preschoolers.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 601-613.


Wilder, D. A., Masuda, A., O’Connor, C., & Baham, M. (2001).  Brief functional analysis and treatment of bizarre vocalizations in an adult with schizophrenia.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 65-68.  


Zager, D. (2005).  Autism Spectrum Disorders Identification, Education, and Treatment.  Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Zarcone, J. R., Fisher, W. W., & Piazza, C.C. (1996).  Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.  Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 247-250.